I tried a copper ionizer for one full season because I was fighting recurring algae even though chlorine was always “in range.” At first it felt like a win. The pool stayed clearer longer, brushing knocked stuff loose easier, and I wasn’t shocking nearly as often. So yeah, copper does slow algae growth, that part is real.
The problems showed up later. Copper is unforgiving if chemistry drifts. When my pH crept up and copper levels climbed just a bit, I started seeing faint greenish staining on the steps and around the returns. Nothing catastrophic, but enough to get my attention. You also can’t ditch chlorine. Copper doesn’t sanitize bathers, so you still need a baseline FC, and if bather load spikes, copper doesn’t help much in the short term.
What finally made me stop using it was the balancing act. You’re managing chlorine, pH, alkalinity, and now copper levels too. One miss and you’re dealing with stains instead of algae. I ended up going back to a more boring setup, steady chlorine and good circulation, plus using aquadoc phosphate remover when nutrients were feeding algae instead of trying to suppress it with metals. That was easier long term and less risky for surfaces.
If someone likes tinkering and testing often, copper can help as a supplement. If you want low stress maintenance, I’d be cautious. Anyone else find copper works great right up until chemistry slips for a week?